The Coldest Laboratory Temperatures Ever Reached

Photo: Pablo Leon / Pexels
Deep space sits at about 2.7 kelvin (−270.45°C / −454.81°F), warmed slightly by the cosmic microwave background, the leftover glow of the Big Bang. Physicists have gone far colder than that inside laboratory chambers no bigger than a refrigerator, pushing clouds of trapped atoms down into the picokelvin range, trillions of times colder than the vacuum between galaxies. The coldest verified laboratory temperatures come from atom-trapping experiments that combine lasers, magnetic fields, and careful evaporation to strip nearly all motion from a tiny sample of matter, and the physics behind them explains why absolute zero itself can never actually be reached.
Why absolute zero can be approached but never reached
Absolute zero — 0 kelvin, equal to −273.15°C (−459.67°F) — is the theoretical temperature at which a system contains the minimum possible thermal energy allowed by quantum mechanics. It is not simply "no motion at all," because the Heisenberg uncertainty principle forbids a particle from having perfectly defined position and momentum at once, so even a hypothetical zero-kelvin system retains a small residual quantum jitter called zero-point energy. What zero kelvin actually represents is a system that cannot give up any more heat to its surroundings, the coldest state consistent with quantum mechanical law.
The reason physicists cannot reach that point experimentally comes from the third law of thermodynamics, first articulated in different forms by Walther Nernst in the early 1900s. The modern statement of the third law says that the entropy (a measure of disorder or the number of ways a system's energy can be arranged) of a perfect crystal approaches a constant minimum as temperature approaches absolute zero, and that no finite sequence of physical processes can actually drive a system's temperature to exactly zero kelvin. Every real cooling technique removes heat by transferring it to something else, and each successive removal step extracts a smaller and smaller fraction of the remaining thermal energy, so getting closer requires infinitely many steps rather than a finite number.
This is why physicists describe record-cold experiments using tiny fractions of a kelvin above zero rather than claiming they have hit the floor. The units matter here, because "cold" language becomes exponential rather than linear once you cross into ultracold physics. A millikelvin is one-thousandth of a kelvin, a microkelvin is one-millionth, a nanokelvin is one-billionth, and a picokelvin is one-trillionth of a kelvin above absolute zero. Each step down that ladder represents roughly a thousand-fold reduction in the residual thermal energy of the sample, and each one has historically required a genuinely new cooling technique rather than just a more careful version of the last one.
How laser cooling removes motion from atoms
Laser cooling is a technique that uses the momentum carried by photons (particles of light) to slow down atoms, exploiting the fact that a moving atom sees laser light shifted in frequency by the Doppler effect. If a laser is tuned to a frequency slightly below an atom's natural absorption frequency and aimed at atoms moving toward the beam, those atoms perceive the oncoming light as blue-shifted into resonance, so they preferentially absorb photons that are traveling opposite to their own motion. Each absorbed photon delivers a tiny momentum kick against the atom's direction of travel, and because this process repeats millions of times per second, the atom's kinetic energy, the physical quantity temperature actually measures at the microscopic scale, drains away steadily.
The technique traces back to theoretical proposals by Theodor Hänsch and Arthur Schawlow in 1975 and was demonstrated experimentally through the following decade. Steven Chu, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, and William Phillips shared the 1997 Nobel Prize in Physics "for development of methods to cool and trap atoms with laser light," work that established laser cooling and the associated technique of magneto-optical trapping (using a combination of laser beams and a magnetic field gradient to both slow and confine atoms in one location) as the foundation of modern ultracold atomic physics (Nobel Prize press release, 1997). A magneto-optical trap arranges six laser beams along three perpendicular axes so that atoms are pushed back toward the center no matter which direction they drift, creating what researchers sometimes describe informally as "optical molasses," a viscous-feeling drag on atomic motion produced entirely by light.
Laser cooling by itself typically bottoms out in the microkelvin range, limited by a phenomenon called the Doppler cooling limit and a subtler recoil effect where the atom absorbs and re-emits photons in random directions, adding back small amounts of kinetic energy even as the cooling process removes it. To go colder than microkelvin territory, physicists needed an entirely different mechanism, one borrowed conceptually from something as mundane as a cooling cup of coffee.
How evaporative cooling pushes past the laser cooling limit
Evaporative cooling works by selectively removing the highest-energy atoms from a magnetically trapped cloud and letting the remaining, colder atoms rethermalize among themselves to a lower average temperature, the same principle by which a hot drink cools as its most energetic molecules escape as steam. Researchers lower the walls of a magnetic or optical trap in a controlled way so that only the fastest-moving atoms have enough energy to escape, and collisions among the remaining atoms redistribute the leftover energy until a new, colder equilibrium is reached. Repeating this evaporation cycle many times, while continuously tightening the trap to maintain a useful density of atoms, is what carries ultracold experiments from the microkelvin range down into nanokelvin and eventually picokelvin territory.
The 1995 breakthrough that made picokelvin physics possible
The technique that turned laser and evaporative cooling into a tool for observing entirely new states of matter is the creation of the Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC), a state in which a large fraction of a dilute atomic gas collapses into the same single quantum state and begins behaving as one coherent wave rather than as billions of individual particles. The phenomenon was predicted theoretically by Satyendra Nath Bose and Albert Einstein in 1924 and 1925, but it required temperatures low enough that atoms' quantum wave functions overlap, something no laboratory could reach until laser and evaporative cooling matured seven decades later.
Eric Cornell and Carl Wieman, working at the University of Colorado Boulder and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), created the first Bose-Einstein condensate in 1995 by cooling a dilute gas of rubidium-87 atoms to about 170 nanokelvin using a combination of laser cooling and magnetic evaporative cooling (Anderson et al., Science, 1995). Wolfgang Ketterle at MIT independently produced a BEC in sodium atoms months later, using techniques that yielded larger and longer-lived condensates suitable for detailed study of their quantum properties. Cornell, Wieman, and Ketterle shared the 2001 Nobel Prize in Physics "for the achievement of Bose-Einstein condensation in dilute gases of alkali atoms, and for early fundamental studies of the properties of the condensates" (Nobel Prize press release, 2001).
The record holders
| Experiment | Approximate temperature | Method | Year / institution |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIT sodium gas cooling | ~450 picokelvin | Laser cooling + evaporative cooling in a magnetic trap | 2003, Ketterle group, MIT |
| Bremen drop tower (MAIUS/QUANTUS collaboration) | ~38 picokelvin | Evaporative cooling followed by ~2 seconds of microgravity free fall | 2021, University of Bremen |
| NASA Cold Atom Lab | Sub-nanokelvin, ongoing microgravity studies | Laser + evaporative cooling aboard the ISS, extended free-fall time | 2018–present, NASA JPL |
| First Bose-Einstein condensate | ~170 nanokelvin | Laser cooling + magnetic evaporative cooling of rubidium-87 | 1995, Cornell & Wieman, JILA/NIST |
| Standard university BEC labs | ~50–500 nanokelvin | Laser + evaporative cooling, now routine equipment | Ongoing, many institutions worldwide |
Every entry on this table used the same two-stage recipe, laser cooling followed by evaporative cooling, but each pushed further by refining trap geometry, extending observation time, or removing gravity from the equation entirely.
MIT physicist Wolfgang Ketterle's group achieved roughly 450 picokelvin in a cloud of sodium atoms in 2003, a record that stood as one of the coldest directly measured temperatures for nearly two decades (Leanhardt et al., Science, 2003). The Bremen drop tower experiments took a different approach to breaking that record: rather than inventing a fundamentally new cooling method, researchers exploited free fall. On Earth, gravity constantly pulls trapped atoms against the walls of their magnetic trap, adding residual energy and limiting how long a cloud can be observed before it must be recaptured or measured. Dropping the entire experimental apparatus down a 146-meter evacuated tower, or flying it on a sounding rocket, removes that gravitational interference for a few seconds, letting an already-cold cloud of atoms expand and thermalize even further before it is measured (Deppner et al., Physical Review Letters, 2021).
NASA's Cold Atom Lab, launched to the International Space Station in 2018, applies the same free-fall logic on a continuous basis. Because the ISS orbits in a persistent state of microgravity rather than a few seconds of drop-tower free fall, atoms inside the Cold Atom Lab can be observed for far longer than any ground-based apparatus allows, a difference that matters enormously for ultracold physics because observation time directly limits how precisely researchers can measure the atoms' remaining motion (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Cold Atom Lab mission overview).
Why anyone bothers getting this cold
At temperatures within a few billionths of a degree of absolute zero, thermal motion stops masking quantum mechanical effects that are normally far too subtle to observe directly in room-temperature matter. This is precisely why Bose-Einstein condensates matter scientifically: when atoms are cooled until their individual quantum wave functions begin to overlap, they lose their separate identities and behave as a single macroscopic quantum object, a phenomenon that lets physicists watch quantum interference, superfluidity, and other effects play out on a scale large enough to photograph rather than infer indirectly.
Ultracold atom experiments have become the backbone of the most precise timekeeping devices ever built. Atomic clocks that use laser-cooled atoms, including the cesium fountain clocks that define the SI second and next-generation optical lattice clocks, rely on cooling atoms to microkelvin or nanokelvin temperatures so that their natural oscillation frequency can be measured without being blurred by thermal motion (NIST, "Atomic Clocks," 2023). Readers curious about how far that precision has advanced can see the current state of the art in the most precise clocks ever built, which covers optical lattice clocks accurate enough that they would not gain or lose a second over the age of the universe.
Beyond timekeeping, ultracold atomic systems are used as sensitive detectors for fundamental physics. Atom interferometers built from laser-cooled atomic clouds can measure gravitational acceleration, rotation, and subtle deviations from known physical laws with extraordinary sensitivity, because a colder atom cloud behaves more like a single coherent quantum wave and less like a noisy scatter of independent particles. These interferometers are being explored as tools for detecting gravitational waves at frequencies inaccessible to instruments like LIGO, and as tests for whether fundamental constants genuinely stay constant over time (Hu et al., "Atom Interferometry for Gravitational Wave Detection," Nature Reviews Physics, 2023).
How does laser cooling actually slow atoms down?
Lasers tuned to a frequency slightly below an atom's resonance exploit the Doppler effect: atoms moving toward the laser beam perceive the light as shifted up into resonance and absorb photons preferentially from that direction, receiving a tiny momentum kick against their own motion. Repeated billions of times per second across beams arranged along multiple axes, these kicks steadily remove kinetic energy, the physical basis of temperature at the atomic scale, from the atom cloud.
Comparing lab cold to the coldest natural places known
Even the coldest natural environments in the observable universe run vastly warmer than a laboratory ultracold atom experiment. The table below lines up several reference points so the scale becomes concrete rather than abstract.
| Location or system | Approximate temperature | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Surface of the Sun | ~5,500°C (5,773 K) | NASA Solar System Exploration |
| Coldest recorded surface temperature on Earth (Antarctica) | −89.2°C (183.95 K) | Vostok Station, Soviet/Russian Antarctic Program, 1983 |
| Deep interstellar space | ~2.7 K (−270.45°C) | Cosmic microwave background, COBE/WMAP measurements |
| Boomerang Nebula (coldest known natural object) | ~1 K (−272.15°C) | NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope observations, 1995 |
| First Bose-Einstein condensate | ~170 nanokelvin | Cornell & Wieman, JILA/NIST, 1995 |
| Bremen drop tower record | ~38 picokelvin | University of Bremen, 2021 |
Even the Boomerang Nebula, the coldest natural object astronomers have found, is roughly 26 billion times warmer than the coldest laboratory temperature ever measured.
The Boomerang Nebula, a preplanetary nebula about 5,000 light-years from Earth, cools itself through rapid gas expansion in a way that pushes its temperature slightly below the cosmic microwave background, making it the coldest known natural location in the universe (NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope observations, 1995). Even so, that natural record sits enormously warmer than what a tabletop laser-cooling apparatus routinely achieves, underscoring how artificial the conditions inside an ultracold physics lab really are; nothing in the observable universe reaches picokelvin temperatures without deliberate, engineered intervention.
What people get wrong about "cold" records
A common misconception is that laboratory cold records represent physically exotic conditions unrelated to everyday cooling. In reality, the underlying principle, removing kinetic energy from particles until their average motion drops, is the same physics behind a household refrigerator or an air conditioner. Laboratory techniques just apply far more precise, far more repeated versions of that removal to an extremely small, isolated cloud of atoms, using tools (lasers and magnetic fields) that a kitchen appliance has no use for.
Another mistake is assuming these ultracold temperatures apply to bulk, everyday-sized objects, or that "the coldest lab in the world" cools an entire room or building to picokelvin levels. Record-cold experiments cool a dilute cloud of atoms, often numbering in the thousands to low millions, suspended in a vacuum chamber and isolated from any physical contact with the trap's walls. Cooling a solid object of ordinary size, even something as small as a grain of sand, down to picokelvin temperatures is not achievable with any current technology, because solids conduct heat far more readily between their internal atoms and any external mechanical structure holding them.
A third confusion involves what "reaching absolute zero" would actually mean if it were possible. Because of quantum zero-point energy, a system at exactly zero kelvin would not have literally zero motion. What it would have is the minimum energy state permitted by the uncertainty principle, a genuinely different and more subtle idea than a naive picture of atoms frozen completely motionless in place.
Why do scientists want to cool atoms this close to absolute zero?
At extremely low temperatures, quantum mechanical effects that are normally hidden by thermal jitter become directly observable and controllable. This enables phenomena like Bose-Einstein condensation, supports development of the most precise atomic clocks used in GPS and fundamental physics research, and gives physicists sensitive new tools, atom interferometers, for probing gravity and searching for physics beyond the current understanding of nature.
What comes after picokelvin
Researchers have not stopped pushing the boundary downward, and the next frontier largely involves extending observation time rather than inventing a wholly new cooling mechanism. Because a colder cloud of atoms spreads out and dilutes faster once released from a trap, the practical limit on measured temperature is often set by how long researchers can watch the cloud before it becomes too diffuse to measure accurately, which is exactly why microgravity platforms like the Bremen drop tower and NASA's Cold Atom Lab have produced the most recent records. Proposed future missions, including longer-duration space-based atom interferometry platforms, aim to combine minutes-long free-fall observation windows with improved trap and detection technology to push measured temperatures still lower (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Cold Atom Lab mission overview).
None of this work is chasing a record for its own sake. Every incremental reduction in achievable temperature has historically unlocked a new class of measurement, from the first direct observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in 1995 to today's optical atomic clocks and gravitational sensors. Cold, in this corner of physics, is less a finish line than a tool that keeps getting sharper the further it is pushed.
The takeaway
The coldest laboratory temperatures ever recorded, down to roughly 38 picokelvin in microgravity drop-tower experiments, come from stacking two techniques: laser cooling, which uses the Doppler effect and photon momentum to drain kinetic energy from atoms, and evaporative cooling, which lets the hottest remaining atoms escape a magnetic trap the way steam escapes a cooling drink. These methods, developed and refined by Nobel-winning physicists including Chu, Cohen-Tannoudji, Phillips, Cornell, Wieman, and Ketterle, let researchers observe quantum behavior directly, build atomic clocks accurate to a second over the age of the universe, and probe fundamental physics with unprecedented sensitivity. Absolute zero itself remains permanently out of reach, a limit set by the third law of thermodynamics and quantum uncertainty rather than by any shortfall in engineering, and the frontier keeps moving not because colder is inherently better, but because each new fraction of a degree closer to zero has historically opened a door to a measurement nobody could make before.
Read next:
- The Most Precise Clocks Ever Built
- The Most Powerful Particle Accelerators
- The Largest Telescopes on Earth
FAQ
Q: What is the coldest temperature ever achieved in a laboratory?
Approximately 38 picokelvin (38 trillionths of a kelvin above absolute zero), reached in 2021 by researchers using the Bremen drop tower to give an already ultracold atom cloud several seconds of microgravity free fall, building on earlier records like MIT's roughly 450 picokelvin sodium gas experiment in 2003.
Q: Why can't scientists reach absolute zero?
The third law of thermodynamics states that no finite sequence of physical processes can remove all thermal energy from a system, because each cooling step extracts a shrinking fraction of the energy that remains, requiring infinitely many steps to reach exactly zero kelvin. Quantum uncertainty adds a further floor, since a system's position and momentum cannot both be perfectly defined, leaving residual zero-point energy even in an idealized zero-kelvin state.
Q: How does laser cooling actually slow atoms down?
Lasers tuned to a frequency slightly below an atom's resonance exploit the Doppler effect: atoms moving toward the beam absorb photons preferentially from that direction and receive a tiny momentum kick opposing their motion, and repeating this billions of times per second steadily drains kinetic energy from the atom cloud. Laser cooling alone typically bottoms out around microkelvin temperatures, which is why evaporative cooling is needed to go colder still.
Q: Why do scientists want to cool atoms this close to absolute zero?
At extremely low temperatures, quantum mechanical effects normally masked by thermal motion become directly observable, enabling phenomena like Bose-Einstein condensates, first created by Eric Cornell and Carl Wieman in 1995. These same ultracold techniques underpin the most precise atomic clocks in use today and support atom-interferometer sensors used to test gravity and search for new physics.
Q: What is a Bose-Einstein condensate?
A Bose-Einstein condensate is a state of matter formed when a dilute gas of atoms is cooled to within billionths of a degree of absolute zero, causing a large fraction of the atoms to collapse into the same quantum state and behave as a single coherent wave rather than as separate particles. It was first produced experimentally in 1995 by Eric Cornell and Carl Wieman using rubidium-87 atoms, work that earned a share of the 2001 Nobel Prize in Physics.
Q: How do scientists measure a temperature that low?
Researchers infer temperature from how fast the atom cloud expands after being released from its trap, since colder atoms move more slowly and the cloud spreads out more gradually. By imaging the cloud's expansion rate at precise time intervals, physicists can calculate the residual average kinetic energy of the atoms and convert it into an equivalent temperature.
Follow new articles
Add SciHub101 to your feed reader to see new science and technology stories.
About the Author
SciHub101 is an independent science and technology publication founded and edited by Buğra Sözeri, a software engineer and app developer based in Türkiye. AI tools assist with drafting and research. Source documentation in the existing archive is uneven, and articles are being reviewed and corrected. The Editorial Team byline identifies editorial responsibility; it does not certify specialist or independent human review. Where we compare products, anything built by our own team is labelled as such — see the editorial guidelines and About page for how corrections and disclosures work.
Related Articles

The Deepest Scientific Drill Holes
The Kola Superdeep Borehole reached 12,262 m, the deepest scientific drill hole. See how deep crust drilling works, what it found, and why it stopped.

The Tallest Mountains on Earth: Everest, Mauna Kea, and Chimborazo Compared
Mount Everest is not the tallest mountain on Earth — and it is not the closest point on Earth's surface to outer space. Both claims belong to other peaks depending on how you define 'tallest.' At 8,848.86 meters (29,031.7 feet) above sea level, Everest wins the elevation contest. But Mauna Kea in Hawaii stands 10,210 meters (33,500 feet) from seafloor base to summit. And Chimborazo in Ecuador, a relatively modest 6,263 meters above sea level, sits 6,384.4 km from Earth's center — 2.1 km farther than Everest's summit.
Onnes and the Discovery of Superconductivity (1911)
On April 8, 1911, Kamerlingh Onnes watched the resistance of mercury vanish in liquid helium. How the experiment worked and why it surprised him.


