Countries with the Highest Divorce Rates (2025 Ranked)

Divorce rate statistics are among the most culturally misread numbers in social science. A country with a high divorce rate is not necessarily one with unhappy marriages — it may simply be one where unhappy people can legally leave. A country with a near-zero divorce rate may not be a bastion of marital bliss but a society where divorce is legally inaccessible, economically impossible for women, or so socially stigmatised that couples separate informally while remaining legally married. The crude divorce rate (divorces per 1,000 people per year) is the standard measure used in international comparisons. A more analytically precise figure is the total divorce rate — the probability that any given marriage will end in divorce — but this requires cohort-tracking data that most countries do not publish consistently. This article uses crude rates with appropriate context.

Where this data comes from

The divorce statistics and country rankings in this article are compiled from three main international sources: the United Nations Statistics Division (which aggregates data from civil registration authorities in every country), the OECD Family Database (which provides standardised divorce metrics for member countries), and Eurostat (which provides detailed European data). All figures represent crude divorce rates — divorces per 1,000 people per year — as this is the most internationally comparable metric available. Data reflects 2022–2024 figures, with most countries reporting 2023 data as of this article's publication. The divorce rates measure legal divorce proceedings, not informal separations or uncounted marital breakdowns. This creates measurement differences: the Philippines' zero divorces does not mean zero marital dissolution, but rather zero legal divorces due to the absence of civil divorce law.

What the data measures and how it is collected

International divorce data is compiled primarily by the United Nations Statistics Division, the OECD Family Database, and Eurostat for European countries. Each uses national civil registration data — the official records of divorces filed and granted by courts or administrative authorities.

There are significant comparability problems. The Philippines records zero divorces because civil divorce is effectively illegal — but separations and annulments still occur; they are simply not counted as divorces. Countries with high informal separation rates (couples who separate without filing for divorce) undercount dissolution of marriages. Countries where divorce procedures are simple and quick (like some Gulf states under Islamic law) may process and record divorces faster than countries with lengthy court-mandated waiting periods.

Source: OECD Family Database — SF3.1: Marriage and divorce rates

The most recent comparable data for most countries covers 2022–2023, with some countries having only 2021 figures available due to reporting lags. COVID-19 caused temporary disruptions in 2020 — court closures reduced registered divorces by an average of 10% across OECD countries in 2020, creating a statistical dip followed by a partial rebound in 2021–2022.

Countries with the highest divorce rates (2022–2024)

(Divorces per 1,000 people per year — UN/OECD/Eurostat data)

Rank	Country	Divorces/1,000	Notes
1	Maldives	5.5	Serial marriage culture; Islamic law
2	Russia	3.9	High early marriage; economic stress
3	Belarus	3.4	Post-Soviet patterns
4	China	3.4	Rapid rise; women initiate 73%
5	Latvia	2.8	EU data 2024
6	Lithuania	2.7	—
7	Kazakhstan	3.0	—
8	Cuba	3.0	State-facilitated; secular
9	Ukraine	2.9	—
10	Estonia	2.6	—
15	Denmark	2.4	—
20	United States	2.3	Declining from 1980s peak of 5.2
25	Canada	2.1	—
30	Australia	2.0	—
35	Germany	1.9	—
40	United Kingdom	1.9	—
45	France	1.9	—
55	South Korea	2.0	Rising sharply
60	Japan	1.5	Rising; still below Western average
70	Turkey	1.7	—
80	Chile	3.6	Unusually high for Catholic-majority country
90	India	0.1	Very low; strong stigma
95	Sri Lanka	0.15	—
100	Philippines	0.0	Civil divorce effectively illegal

OECD average crude divorce rate in 2022–2023: approximately 1.8 per 1,000

Source: OECD — Society at a Glance 2024, Marriage and Divorce chapter

Why these countries lead in divorce rates

The world's highest-divorcing countries reflect three distinct patterns. The Maldives (5.5) leads through a unique cultural norm of serial marriage in Islamic family law combined with small island demographics. Russia and post-Soviet countries (3.0–3.9) occupy the upper tier due to a combination of early marriage norms, economic stress from the 1990s transition, and secularism that removed religious barriers to divorce. China (3.4) represents a dramatic rise driven by female economic independence — women now initiate 73% of divorces — reflecting the transformation of marriage from economic arrangement to partnership expectation. Notably absent from the highest rankings are most wealthy Western countries: the United States (2.3) is now below Denmark, Latvia, and Estonia; Denmark (2.4) remains at the OECD average despite near-universal female workforce participation; and Nordic countries consistently show moderate divorce rates alongside high marital satisfaction. The pattern suggests divorce rates track not marital unhappiness but legal accessibility, economic independence, and secularisation — the ability to leave when desired rather than the desire to leave.

Historical context — how divorce became possible

For most of recorded history in most cultures, marriage was legally or practically indissoluble. Roman law permitted divorce, but most medieval European law — heavily influenced by Catholic canon law — did not. The Church's position was that marriage was a sacrament, binding until death, and divorce was spiritually impermissible. This position shaped European legal systems for nearly a thousand years.

Henry VIII's 1533 break with Rome over his desire to divorce Catherine of Aragon is the most famous episode in the political history of divorce, but it did not immediately liberalise divorce law — it simply transferred authority from the Pope to the English Crown and, later, Parliament. Divorce in England remained possible only through private Act of Parliament (requiring tremendous expense and social status) until the Matrimonial Causes Act 1857, which created civil divorce courts for the first time.

The 20th century saw progressive liberalisation across most Western countries. France legalised divorce in 1884 (having banned it from 1816 to 1884). Italy only permitted civil divorce in 1970, following a referendum. Ireland legalised divorce in 1996. Malta — the last EU member state — legalised divorce in 2011. The Philippines remains the only country outside the Vatican where civil divorce is effectively unavailable to most citizens.

Source: Our World in Data — Marriages and Divorces

Divorce rates rose sharply across Western countries during the 1960s–1980s, driven by no-fault divorce laws (removing the requirement to prove spousal misconduct), female economic independence, and cultural shifts in expectations of marriage. The US divorce rate peaked at approximately 5.2 per 1,000 in 1980 — a rate that has nearly halved since. This historical arc is the most important context for understanding current statistics.

Maldives — the world's highest divorce rate explained

The Maldives' rate of approximately 5.5 divorces per 1,000 people is more than six times the global average, and its explanation is genuinely different from any other country in the top rankings.

Islamic personal law and accessibility. In the Maldives, Islamic law (fiqh) governs personal status including marriage and divorce. A husband may divorce his wife through talaq — a verbal declaration — which takes effect immediately under Maldivian law. A wife may seek khul' divorce by returning her dowry. The procedure does not require lengthy court proceedings, mandatory waiting periods, or contested litigation in the way civil divorce does in most countries. Divorce is legally accessible in a way that depresses the friction that keeps divorce rates low elsewhere.

Serial marriage. The Maldives has developed a culturally specific pattern of sequential marriages, particularly in the outer atolls. Individuals may marry and divorce 3, 4, or 5 times over a lifetime without significant social penalty. This pattern is not simply a product of Islamic law — other Muslim-majority countries with similar legal frameworks do not have comparable divorce rates. It reflects a cultural norm that appears to have developed within the specific social structure of small island communities, where the social consequences of divorce are attenuated.

Population scale effects. With a total population of approximately 530,000, the absolute number of divorces needed to produce a rate of 5.5 per 1,000 is modest — roughly 2,900 divorces annually. A few hundred additional or fewer divorces would move the rate significantly. Small-population countries are more sensitive to this statistical amplification.

Comparability note. The Maldives figure is sometimes questioned because some other Muslim-majority countries have substantially lower rates despite similar legal frameworks. This suggests Maldivian divorce culture has a cultural component beyond the purely legal — but available data does not allow this to be precisely disaggregated.

Russia and post-Soviet Europe — the divorce cluster

Russia (3.9), Belarus (3.4), Latvia (2.8), Lithuania (2.7), and several other post-Soviet states consistently occupy the upper tier of global divorce rankings. The pattern is structural, not coincidental.

Early marriage. Soviet culture normalised marriage at 18–22, often before financial independence was established. Young marriages are statistically the most divorce-prone in every culture studied: couples who marry young grow in different directions, and marriages formed before adult identity is established are more likely to dissolve when that identity develops. In Russia today, the median age at first marriage has risen, but the cohorts that married young in the Soviet era are still in their peak divorce years.

Economic stress. Post-Soviet economic transitions — particularly the catastrophic 1990s collapse in Russia, Belarus, and the Baltic states — created severe household financial pressure. Economic conflict is among the most consistently identified predictors of divorce in large-scale survey research. Unemployment, income insecurity, and the stress of navigating market economies after a lifetime of planned-economy employment strained marriages that might otherwise have persisted.

Secularism. Seventy years of Soviet atheism suppressed religious practice across the population. Religious observance correlates negatively with divorce rates — couples who attend religious services regularly divorce at roughly half the rate of secular couples in most countries studied. The removal of religious barriers to divorce during the Soviet era left a legacy of secular attitudes that persist.

Source: World Population Review — Divorce Rates by Country 2026

Housing. Soviet communal housing arrangements meant that divorced couples sometimes legally divorced but continued living in the same apartment because neither had the resources to move. The divorce rate in this context measures legal relationship dissolution, not physical separation — the Soviet housing system produced higher registered divorce rates than physical separation rates would suggest.

China — the most dramatic rise of any large country

China's divorce rate has risen from near-zero in the early 1970s to approximately 3.4 per 1,000 in recent years — a transformation that mirrors the pattern seen in South Korea and Taiwan approximately one generation earlier, and in Western Europe and North America two generations before that.

The female economic independence mechanism. The primary driver is structural: as Chinese women entered the workforce in large numbers, achieved higher education, and moved to cities, they gained the economic capacity to leave marriages they could not previously afford to exit. This is the single most robust finding in comparative divorce research — female labour force participation and divorce rates correlate across countries and over time within countries with remarkable consistency. In China, women now initiate approximately 73% of divorce proceedings.

Government response. The Chinese government, concerned about the social stability implications of rising divorce rates and falling birth rates, introduced a mandatory 30-day "cooling off" period for divorce applications in January 2021. Divorcing couples must wait 30 days after submitting an application before it can be finalised, and either party may withdraw the application during this period. The policy reduced registered divorces sharply in 2021 but appears to have primarily created a processing backlog rather than changing the underlying rate of relationship dissolution. Critics — including domestic violence advocates — noted that the policy could trap abuse victims in dangerous situations.

The policy is notable as a rare case of a government explicitly trying to lower its country's divorce rate through procedural barriers rather than legal prohibition.

Countries where divorce is illegal or severely restricted

Philippines. The Philippines is the only country other than the Vatican where civil divorce is effectively unavailable to most citizens. Under Philippine law, marriage is indissoluble; a Catholic annulment through Church courts is the primary recourse, but it requires years of proceedings and costs approximately $5,000–$15,000+, making it inaccessible to most Filipinos. A divorce bill has been debated in congress for decades; it passed the House of Representatives in 2024 but faces opposition in the Senate and from the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines, which remains politically influential.

Approximately 1 million Filipinos are currently estimated to be in separated-but-not-legally-dissolved marriages, with no legal recourse to remarry domestically. Filipino citizens who are foreign nationals may divorce overseas and have it recognised in the Philippines, creating a legal avenue available to the wealthy and internationally mobile.

Malta. Malta legalised divorce in 2011 following a national referendum, becoming the last EU member state to do so. Divorce passed with 53% support after a campaign in which the Church actively opposed it. Malta's current divorce rate of approximately 0.9 per 1,000 reflects both the recent legalisation and a predominantly Catholic population with existing cultural reservations about divorce.

Ireland. Ireland legalised divorce in 1995 (effective 1997), also following a referendum — passed by the narrowest possible margin of less than 1 percentage point. Ireland's current rate of approximately 0.6 per 1,000 reflects its relatively recent legalisation.

Source: Eurostat — Marriage and divorce statistics

United States — context for the "epidemic" narrative

The United States is frequently cited in popular discourse as having an unusually high divorce rate, with the oft-repeated statistic that "50% of marriages end in divorce." This figure requires significant qualification.

The 50% figure derives from crude rate comparisons at the peak of US divorce rates in the late 1970s and early 1980s. At its 1980 peak, the US divorce rate reached approximately 5.2 per 1,000 — genuinely high by international standards. Since then, the rate has declined every decade, reaching approximately 2.3 per 1,000 in the most recent data. The US rate is now below several European nations including Denmark, Estonia, and Latvia.

The cohort-based calculation — tracking the actual probability that marriages formed in specific years will eventually end in divorce — is more precise than crude rates. For marriages formed in the 1970s and early 1980s, the probability was close to 50%. For marriages formed since 2000, the projected probability is approximately 35–40%, reflecting both lower crude rates and the trend toward later marriage.

Age at marriage as the key predictor. The average age at first marriage in the US has risen from approximately 23 (men) and 21 (women) in 1980 to 30 (men) and 28 (women) in 2023. Older age at marriage is the strongest individual-level predictor of marital stability in most studies. The apparent "decline in divorce" is partly a story about people marrying later, after establishing careers and adult identity.

Selection effects. Marriage rates in the US have also declined — fewer people marry than in previous generations, and the people who do marry are increasingly those with higher education and income, who divorce at lower rates than the population average. The cohabitation revolution has absorbed many partnerships that would previously have been formalised as marriages.

Surprises in the data

Chile at 3.6 per 1,000. Chile is a majority-Catholic country where civil divorce was only legalised in 2004. The rate jumped sharply after legalisation and has continued rising, reflecting pent-up demand from marriages that had been practically dissolved for years before legal mechanisms existed. Chile's current rate is higher than several post-Soviet states — illustrating the pattern where legalisation initially produces elevated rates as existing broken marriages are formally dissolved.

EU divorce rate divergence. Within the EU, the gap between lowest (Malta: 0.9) and highest (Latvia: 2.8) crude divorce rates spans a threefold range. This divergence reflects the EU's diversity of religious traditions, marriage patterns, and economic conditions more than any convergence toward a European norm.

Japan's rising rate. Japan's divorce rate of approximately 1.5 per 1,000 is below the Western average but has been rising steadily since the 1960s, driven by the same female economic independence dynamic seen in South Korea, China, and Taiwan. Japanese women now initiate more than half of divorces. The cultural shift in what marriage is expected to provide — from an economic arrangement to an emotional and partnership-based relationship — is reshaping expectations in ways that legal frameworks are slow to accommodate.

Frequently asked questions

Q: Does divorce rate equal marital unhappiness? A: Not directly. Low divorce rates in some countries reflect legal inaccessibility (Philippines), social stigma (India), or economic dependency that traps people in marriages they wish to leave. The Nordic countries have moderate divorce rates despite consistently ranking as the world's happiest populations. High divorce rates can reflect healthy social systems where unhappy marriages can be exited without catastrophic consequences. The meaningful question is not how many divorces occur, but whether people can leave marriages they want to leave.

Q: Is divorce rising or falling globally? A: Mixed picture. In Western Europe and North America, divorce rates peaked in the 1970s–1990s and have generally declined, partly because fewer people marry. In East Asia (China, South Korea, Taiwan), rates are rising sharply as female economic independence grows. In South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, rates remain very low but are beginning to rise in urban areas. The global OECD average stabilised around 1.8 per 1,000 in 2022–2023 after declining from a peak in the late 1990s.

Q: What is the link between divorce and children's outcomes? A: Decades of research finds that high-conflict intact marriages are worse for children's outcomes than low-conflict divorces. Children are most affected by the level of parental conflict, economic stability post-divorce, and quality of co-parenting arrangements — not the legal marital status of their parents. Countries with strong child support enforcement, shared parenting norms, and post-divorce family support services show smaller outcome gaps between children of divorced and married parents.

Q: What is the difference between separation and divorce? A: Legal divorce formally dissolves a marriage, allowing parties to remarry and dividing marital property under law. Separation is a physical and often financial split without legal dissolution. In countries where divorce is unavailable or expensive, high separation rates may accompany low divorce rates. The Philippines is the clearest example: estimated 1 million+ separated couples who cannot legally divorce. Crude divorce rate data does not capture separation rates and thus understates relationship dissolution in legally restrictive environments.

Q: Does cohabitation affect divorce statistics? A: Significantly. In countries where long-term cohabitation without marriage is common — notably the Nordic countries, France, and the Netherlands — many partnership dissolutions occur without any divorce proceeding, because no marriage existed. This suppresses the crude divorce rate relative to the actual relationship dissolution rate. As cohabitation grows as an alternative to marriage, crude divorce rates will continue to decline even if underlying relationship stability does not improve.

Q: Why did COVID-19 reduce divorce rates? A: Court closures and lockdown restrictions in 2020 made filing for divorce physically difficult or impossible in many jurisdictions. Divorce proceedings are administrative processes that require in-person attendance at courts or registration offices; when those closed, filings dropped. The OECD average fell approximately 10% in 2020 and partially rebounded in 2021–2022 as backlogs cleared. There was no sustained effect on the underlying rate.

Source: OECD — Marriage and divorce: Society at a Glance 2024

The takeaway

Divorce rates are proxies for female autonomy, economic independence, religious practice, and legal infrastructure — not for marital unhappiness per se. The Maldives' world-leading rate reflects a specific Islamic cultural tradition of serial marriage in small island communities; Russia's high rates reflect post-Soviet early marriage and economic stress; China's rapidly rising rate is the story of a generation of female economic transformation. The US rate — frequently used to support a narrative of social breakdown — has been falling since 1980 and is now below several European nations. The Philippines demonstrates not marital quality but a legal system that prohibits exit. The global trend, as countries develop economically and women gain labour market participation and educational equality, is toward rising divorce rates — a pattern that has played out in every wealthy country that preceded the current developing world. Whether that represents social progress or social cost depends on what you believe marriage is for.

---

Read next:

• Countries with the Highest Marriage Rates
• Countries with the Highest Birth Rates
• Countries with the Highest Voter Turnout