How Astronauts Survive in Space: Life Support Systems Explained

Photo: Mikhail Nilov / Pexels
On March 29, 1971, a Soyuz 11 spacecraft descending to Earth lost cabin pressure at an altitude of 104 kilometers. The three cosmonauts aboard—Georgy Dobrovolski, Vladimir Patsayev, and Alexei Volkov—died from rapid decompression. The capsule continued its ballistic descent and landed intact, but its crew were dead. The incident, the only human deaths in the vacuum of space, illustrated a fundamental constraint: humans cannot survive more than 30 seconds in the vacuum of space without a pressurized container. Yet astronauts on the International Space Station spend six months in continuous orbit, 400 kilometers above Earth, exposed to hard vacuum separated from life by aluminum walls measuring only 10 millimeters thick. The margin between survival and catastrophic failure is impossibly thin. This essay examines the engineering that keeps astronauts alive in space: the environmental control and life support systems (ECLSS) that manage oxygen, carbon dioxide, water, temperature, pressure, and radiation — and why these systems are barely adequate for near-Earth missions and far from sufficient for human missions to Mars.
The Space Environment: Four Lethal Threats
Space presents threats that do not exist on Earth. Understanding these threats clarifies why life support is complex.
Vacuum and pressure loss. At sea level, atmospheric pressure is 101.3 kilopascals (kPa), or 1 atmosphere (atm). This pressure is exerted by the weight of air above you. In space, there is no air and no pressure. Sudden exposure to vacuum causes explosive decompression: blood boils, air expands in the lungs, consciousness is lost in seconds. Death is not immediate (humans can survive up to 90 seconds in vacuum if breathing is controlled), but is rapid. A spacesuit prevents this by maintaining an internal pressure of 4.3 psi (0.3 atm) inside the suit, sufficient to keep the body's fluids from boiling.
Temperature extremes. In the sunlit hemisphere, temperature reaches approximately 150 degrees Celsius (302°F). In the shadow side of Earth orbit, temperature drops to approximately −150 degrees Celsius (−238°F). This extreme swing (a 300-degree Celsius range) occurs because space has no air to transfer heat (convection is impossible without a medium). Heat is lost only by radiation (electromagnetic emission), a much slower process. A spacecraft in sunlight absorbs solar radiation and becomes very hot; in shadow, it radiates heat away and becomes very cold. This swing occurs every 90 minutes on the ISS (one orbit per 90 minutes).
Radiation. Outside Earth's magnetosphere, astronauts are exposed to solar wind (primarily protons and electrons from the Sun, energy 1–100 mega-electron volts) and cosmic rays (primarily protons and alpha particles, energy 100 mega-electron volts to 10^20 eV). The magnetosphere shields Earth from most of this radiation; spacecraft shielding reduces it further. Still, astronauts on the ISS receive a dose of approximately 150–200 millisieverts per year, compared to approximately 2–3 millisieverts per year for people on Earth. The increased radiation risk includes acute radiation sickness (at very high doses), cancer (at moderate doses accumulated over years), and cataracts. Shielding from radiation is difficult: dense materials like lead can increase radiation risk for high-energy cosmic rays (by generating secondary particles), so spacecraft are shielded with polyethylene or aluminum.
Hypoxia and toxic gases. The vacuum contains no oxygen. Spacecraft must provide oxygen and remove carbon dioxide and other metabolic waste gases. A human at rest consumes approximately 0.84 kilograms of oxygen per day and produces approximately 1 kilogram of carbon dioxide per day. Over a 6-month mission, this amounts to 150 kilograms of oxygen and 180 kilograms of carbon dioxide. Without recycling, a spacecraft would need to carry enormous supplies.
Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) — the collection of mechanical, chemical, and biological systems maintaining breathable atmosphere, temperature, humidity, and radiation shielding inside a spacecraft.
Source: NASA Technical Reports Server (2021), "ISS Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) Overview," NASA/TM-20210009276 — the primary engineering reference for ISS life support architecture and performance.
The ISS ECLSS: How Oxygen, CO2, and Water Are Managed
The International Space Station houses six astronauts continuously and has maintained continuous human occupation since November 2000. The ECLSS is the most operationally proven life support system in human spaceflight.
Oxygen Generation
The ISS uses two primary methods to generate oxygen:
Electrolysis — splitting water (H₂O) using electrical current into hydrogen (H₂) and oxygen (O₂). The reaction is:
2 H₂O → 2 H₂ + O₂
The ISS uses a solar-powered electrolyzer called the Oxygen Generation System (OGS), installed in 2008. It produces approximately 1 kilogram of oxygen per day, enough to sustain 3–4 astronauts. The OGS requires solar power (which varies with orbital position and season) and water supply. The hydrogen byproduct is vented overboard (it escapes to space).
Solid fuel oxygen generators — chemical cartridges that release oxygen through an exothermic reaction when activated. The ISS maintains a supply of these cartridges as backup. Each cartridge provides oxygen for several hours and is used during contingencies.
Together, these systems provide approximately 1 kilogram of oxygen per day to the ISS, sufficient for the six-person crew.
Carbon Dioxide Removal
CO₂ removal is critical: carbon dioxide accumulation in closed environments leads to hypercapnia (elevated blood CO₂), causing headaches, fatigue, and eventually respiratory distress.
Lithium hydroxide (LiOH) beds absorb CO₂ from the air. The reaction is:
2 LiOH + CO₂ → Li₂CO₃ + H₂O
LiOH beds are simple, reliable, and have been used since the Apollo program. The ISS maintains beds that are regularly replaced. Each bed lasts several weeks before becoming saturated.
Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CRA) — a more advanced system using molecular sieves (solid materials with porous structure) to absorb and release CO₂ using temperature swings. The ISS is transitioning from LiOH to CRA because sieves are regenerable (can be reused by heating) and reduce consumable waste.
The combination of these systems removes approximately 1 kilogram of CO₂ per day, matching production.
Water Recycling
Water management is critical for long-duration missions. A human produces approximately 1 kilogram of water per day through respiration (exhaled breath is saturated with water vapor) and perspiration. Additionally, the electrolysis process produces water (hydrogen combines with atmospheric oxygen if hydrogen is not vented).
Water recovery on the ISS recycles approximately 90 percent of urine and wastewater. The system includes:
- Urine processor: uses vacuum distillation to separate water from dissolved salts and urea. Brine (salty residue) is retained and periodically vented to space via cargo spacecraft.
- Wastewater processor: treats humidity condensate (water recovered from the air) and wastewater from hygiene activities.
- Potable water storage: purified water is stored and distributed to astronauts for drinking and other uses.
The remaining 10 percent of water is resupplied by cargo spacecraft (approximately 600 kilograms of water are launched to the ISS per year via Progress and Dragon cargo vehicles).
| ECLSS Component | Function | Status | ISS Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxygen Generation System (OGS) | Electrolysis of water | Operational since 2008 | 1 kg O₂/day (3–4 people) |
| Lithium Hydroxide beds | CO₂ absorption | Consumable | ~1 kg CO₂ removal/day |
| Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly | Regenerable CO₂ removal | Operational since 2010 | Reduces consumable waste |
| Urine Processor | Recovers water from urine | Operational since 2008 | 90% recovery; 10% brine vented |
| Wastewater Processor | Recovers humidity condensate | Operational since 2010 | Integrates with urine processor |
| Thermal control system | Radiators + fluid loops | Operational | Rejects 239 kW waste heat in sunlight |
Source: NASA Technical Reports Server (2015), "ISS Environmental Control and Life Support System Technology Development for Exploration," NASA/TM-2015-219022 — performance analysis of ISS ECLSS components and technology readiness levels.
Temperature and Humidity Control
The ISS must maintain internal temperature around 21–24 degrees Celsius despite temperature swings of 300 degrees Celsius in the external environment.
Thermal control loops circulate fluid (glycol and water mixture) through the spacecraft, rejecting heat to space radiators. The ISS has two external radiator arrays, each measuring approximately 73 meters × 11 meters (roughly the size of a football field), with a total heat rejection capacity of approximately 239 kilowatts. This is necessary because the ISS generates substantial waste heat from life support systems, computers, solar panels, and astronaut metabolism.
Humidity control removes excess water vapor. While water is valuable on the ISS, excess humidity (above 70 percent relative humidity) promotes mold growth and condensation on sensitive equipment. The system maintains humidity between 30 and 70 percent.
Pressure Regulation
The ISS maintains internal pressure at approximately 101.3 kPa (1 atm), identical to sea level Earth pressure. This requires:
- Nitrogen buffer: inert nitrogen is stored in tanks and used to maintain baseline pressure.
- Oxygen feedback control: the percentage of oxygen is maintained at approximately 21 percent (matching Earth air) by adjusting oxygen supply from the OGS.
- Pressure relief valves: if pressure rises above safe limits, vents release excess air to space.
Spacesuits: Individual Protection
While the spacecraft provides the primary life support environment, astronauts wearing spacesuits can venture outside in Extravehicular Activity (EVA). A spacesuit is a miniature spacecraft, containing all the life support functions of a spacecraft compressed into a portable form.
Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) — the spacesuit used for ISS EVAs, weighing approximately 130 kilograms (including backpack and cooling systems). The EMU maintains:
- Pressure: 0.3 atm inside the suit (a lower pressure than Earth, which reduces mobility restrictions but increases oxygen requirements).
- Oxygen supply: a primary oxygen tank and a backup tank, providing up to 7 hours of oxygen for one EVA. The oxygen is stored as compressed gas at approximately 300 atmospheres pressure.
- CO₂ removal: lithium hydroxide canisters inside the suit remove exhaled CO₂, similar to those used in spacecraft.
- Cooling: liquid cooling garments circulate water (approximately 15–20 degrees Celsius) through tubes in the suit to remove the heat generated by the astronaut (approximately 100–150 watts during EVA) and absorbed from sunlight.
- Temperature: the suit maintains approximately 20–21 degrees Celsius inside despite external temperature swings of 300 degrees Celsius. This is achieved through the combination of cooling fluid circulation, insulation layers (multiple layers of aluminized mylar), and radiative emitters on the backpack.
- Thermal protection: the suit exterior includes layers of reflective material to minimize solar heating (approximately 1,000 W/m² in sunlit orbit) and radiative loss in shadow.
Spacesuit Design Challenges
The EMU's design involves critical trade-offs:
Source: Abercromby, R.J. et al. (2008), "Spacesuits for Lunar Operations: Recent Improvements and Assessment of Needed Development," NASA/TM-2008-215147 — technical analysis of spacesuit design requirements and engineering trade-offs for EVA.
Pressure management: Lower suit pressure (0.3 atm) reduces mechanical restriction and allows better mobility compared to higher-pressure suits. However, lower pressure requires astronauts to breathe pure oxygen (or oxygen-enriched mixtures), which increases the risk of oxygen toxicity at depth and introduces nitrogen washout time (pre-breathing). Astronauts must pre-breathe pure oxygen for several hours before EVA to remove nitrogen from their bodies, preventing decompression sickness.
Thermal control: The suit must reject approximately 100–150 watts of metabolic heat while preventing heat loss in shadow. The liquid cooling garment is crucial for this. However, the water loop adds weight and complexity. Without adequate cooling, an astronaut would experience heat stress and dehydration in sunlight; without adequate insulation, they would experience hypothermia in shadow.
Mobility: Spacesuits restrict movement. Joints must be flexible enough for work but rigid enough to maintain pressure. The EMU gloves are notorious for being difficult to operate; astronauts must frequently remove and replace them because extended use causes hand fatigue and blistering.
Reliability: A failure of the cooling system, oxygen supply, or pressure seal is catastrophic. The suit is therefore highly redundant (backup oxygen, backup cooling loops), but redundancy adds weight. An EVA suit approaches the weight limit that a spacewalking astronaut can maneuver (150+ kilograms is approximately the maximum manageable load in microgravity, pushing the limits of body strength).
The EMU has been in use since 1981 and is now 45+ years old. NASA is developing next-generation suits (xEMU, Extravehicular Mobility Unit) for lunar missions, with better mobility, improved thermal control, and higher reliability.
Source: NASA EVA Suit Design Reference (2020), "EMU (Extravehicular Mobility Unit) Technical Specification," NASA JSC-based documentation — spacesuit specifications and performance data.
Radiation Shielding
The ISS orbits at 400 kilometers altitude, below the inner Van Allen radiation belt (which peaks at approximately 3,000 kilometers altitude). This location provides significant radiation protection: Earth's magnetosphere shields the ISS from much of the solar wind.
Source: Van Allen, J.A. (1959), "Observation of High-Intensity Radiation by Satellites 1958 Alpha and Gamma," Journal of Jet Propulsion, Vol. 28 — the foundational paper on the discovery and characterization of radiation belts.
Despite this shielding, astronauts on the ISS receive approximately 150–200 millisieverts per year (compared to approximately 2–3 millisieverts per year on Earth). This is primarily from:
- Solar protons: during solar particle events, the Sun emits high-energy protons. The ISS shielding (aluminum and polyethylene walls) provides some protection.
- Galactic cosmic rays: high-energy protons and heavier nuclei from outside the solar system. These are harder to shield (dense materials can increase risk by generating secondary radiation).
- Trapped radiation: the Van Allen belts contain high-energy electrons and protons; the ISS occasionally passes through the South Atlantic Anomaly (a region of weak magnetosphere), receiving higher radiation doses.
Radiation Health Effects
The biological effects of radiation depend on dose rate and total dose. At 150–200 mSv/year, astronauts face several risks:
Acute radiation sickness occurs at doses above 1,000 mSv (1 sievert). At these doses, cells die faster than they can be replaced, causing nausea, vomiting, immune suppression, and potentially death. ISS astronauts are at no risk of acute effects.
Cancer risk increases above 100 mSv cumulative dose. The dose-response relationship is linear at low doses: each additional millisievert of exposure increases cancer risk by approximately 0.05 percent. For an astronaut receiving 150 mSv/year, after 5 years the cumulative dose is 750 mSv, corresponding to an increased cancer risk of approximately 37.5 percent above baseline (which is approximately 25 percent). This is substantial. After 20 years on the ISS (multiple missions), cumulative exposure could approach 3,000 mSv.
Cataracts develop in the lens of the eye from radiation damage. The risk increases significantly above 50 mSv cumulative dose. Astronauts with high mission histories (multiple long-duration flights) show higher rates of cataracts compared to the general population.
Cognitive effects at very high doses (above 1,000 mSv). Some evidence suggests that cosmic ray exposure to the central nervous system could impair cognitive function on very long missions (Mars transit, 6+ months in deep space), though the evidence is preliminary.
Radiation Mitigation Strategies
NASA has several strategies to manage radiation exposure:
Career dose limits: NASA limits male astronauts to 1,000 mSv career exposure and female astronauts to 500 mSv (lower because women have higher radiation sensitivity, possibly due to breast cancer risk). These limits correspond to approximately 4–8 years of continuous ISS residence.
Passive shielding: the ISS is designed with thicker walls in crew quarters and shielding materials (polyethylene, water bags) positioned to reduce radiation exposure during sleep and rest.
Water shielding: the ISS stores water in bags that can be repositioned for shielding during solar particle events. Water is excellent shielding material because it contains hydrogen atoms that absorb radiation.
Solar event shelters: during predicted solar particle events, astronauts retreat to the most heavily shielded part of the ISS (typically near the center of the Russian segment).
Current spacecraft shielding is passive (walls of polyethylene and aluminum). Active shielding (using electromagnetic fields to deflect charged particles) is under research but not operationally deployed. The challenge is that active shielding requires enormous power to generate protective magnetic fields and is not practical for current spacecraft.
The radiation dose on the ISS (150–200 mSv/year) is a significant constraint on human spaceflight. It is one reason why most ISS missions are limited to 6 months and why long-duration missions to Mars will require either better shielding technology or shorter transit times (requiring faster propulsion systems).
Source: Durante, M. and Cucinotta, F.A. (2008), "Heavy Ion Carcinogenesis and Human Space Exploration," Nature Reviews Cancer, Vol. 8(6) — research on radiation exposure risks for long-duration spaceflight and Mars missions.
Source: NASA Radiation Health Office (2021), "Space Radiation Shielding Design and Assessment," NASA/TM-2020-220664 — analysis of radiation protection strategies and exposure limits for human spaceflight.
Challenges for Deep-Space Missions: Mars and Beyond
The ISS ECLSS is reliable for near-Earth missions of up to 6 months. However, a mission to Mars requires 6–9 months transit each way, plus 18 months surface time, for a total of 2.5–3 years. Current ECLSS cannot sustain such missions.
Source: Jones, H. (2004), "Life Support for Deep Space and Mars," NASA/CR-2004-208563 — comprehensive analysis of life support requirements and technological challenges for human Mars missions.
The Problem: Consumable Losses
The ISS recycles water (90 percent recovery) and oxygen but loses approximately 10 percent per cycle. Over 3 years, this adds up:
- Water: a crew of 4 loses approximately 600 kilograms of water per year (10 percent loss). Over 3 years, this is 1,800 kilograms. A spacecraft would need to carry this water as supply (massive weight) or improve recycling efficiency above 95 percent.
- Nitrogen: inert nitrogen for atmosphere maintenance is lost through leaks and oxygen burn-ups. Current systems cannot recover nitrogen efficiently.
- Oxygen: while the ISS generates oxygen through electrolysis, deep-space missions in cislunar space do not have guaranteed sunlight (solar arrays can be shaded). Backup oxygen sources are heavy.
Advanced Life Support Research
NASA and ESA are developing advanced ECLSS for Mars missions:
Regenerative ECLSS: closed-loop systems reclaiming 99 percent of water and oxygen. These use advanced molecular sieves, biological processes (algae or bacteria to produce oxygen from CO₂), and vacuum distillation.
Bioregenerative systems: using plants or algae to recycle CO₂ and produce oxygen. These systems are more complex (require light, temperature, humidity control) but theoretically could sustain crews indefinitely. The Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative (MELISSA) project by ESA is developing these systems.
Waste processing: converting human waste (feces, sweat, urine) into useful compounds (fertilizer, water, fuel). Current systems treat waste as toxic and discard it; advanced systems recycle it as a resource.
The goal is a closed-loop system that requires no resupply except food. Current technology is not there. A Mars mission will require carrying substantial consumables (water, oxygen, spare parts) and accepting some mission risk.
| Aspect | ISS (Near-Earth) | Mars Mission Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Water recovery | 90% | >95% (resupply not feasible) |
| Oxygen generation | Solar electrolysis | Solar + backup chemical sources |
| CO₂ removal | Regenerable sieves + LiOH backup | 99%+ closed-loop |
| Radiation shielding | Passive walls + magnetosphere | Active shielding or physical mass |
| Mission duration | 6 months | 2.5–3 years |
| Technology readiness | Operational | 7–8 (development/prototype) |
Source: NASA Advanced Exploration Systems (2023), "Technology Development for Mars Missions: Life Support Requirements and Roadmap," NASA/SP-2023-3706 — roadmap for advanced ECLSS for deep-space human missions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: How long can an astronaut survive without a spacesuit in space?
A: Approximately 30 seconds to 90 seconds, depending on whether breathing is controlled. Rapid decompression causes explosive boiling of blood and immediate loss of consciousness. Death occurs from oxygen deprivation and organ failure, not from decompression per se. The Soyuz 11 crew died from decompression at 104 kilometers altitude.
Q: Can astronauts drink water that has been recycled from urine?
A: Yes. The ISS urine processor distills urine and purifies it to drinking-water quality. Astronauts report that recycled water is safe and tastes fine. The psychological barrier is often greater than the actual health risk. One joking quote from an astronaut: "Yesterday's coffee is today's coffee."
Q: How do astronauts breathe in space?
A: Spacesuits and spacecraft maintain pressure and oxygen. In a spacesuit, oxygen comes from tanks (primary and backup). In the spacecraft, oxygen is generated by electrolysis of water and maintained at 21 percent of the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is removed by lithium hydroxide or regenerable sieves.
Q: Why is the ISS radiator so large?
A: The ISS generates approximately 239 kilowatts of waste heat in sunlight (from solar panels, computers, life support, and human metabolism). This heat must be rejected to space. Radiators work by radiating heat as infrared radiation. The only way to dump heat in space is through radiation (no convection, no conduction). Large radiator area is needed to achieve sufficient heat rejection.
Q: Can astronauts go outside (EVA) whenever they want?
A: No. Extravehicular Activity is limited by:
- Consumables: each EVA uses oxygen and consumable supplies. ISS astronauts perform approximately 1–3 EVAs per mission, each lasting 6–7 hours.
- Safety: two suit-ups in 24 hours increases nitrogen decompression sickness risk (the "bends," which affects divers and spacewalkers).
- Scheduling: EVAs require training and coordination with mission control. They are planned months in advance.
Q: Is the ISS shielding from radiation sufficient?
A: The ISS is shielded from most solar wind by Earth's magnetosphere and by its aluminum/polyethylene walls. However, astronauts still receive 50–100 times higher radiation dose than on Earth. Deep-space missions (to Mars) will require active shielding or additional mass because magnetic field protection will not be available.
Q: How do astronauts sleep in microgravity?
A: Astronauts sleep in sleeping bags attached to walls or cabinets. Microgravity prevents them from falling, so they do not need beds. They sleep 6–8 hours per day, similar to Earth. Some astronauts report that they sleep better in microgravity because there is no pressure on their bodies.
Conclusion
Astronauts survive in space through a combination of individual protection (spacesuits) and spacecraft life support systems. The ISS ECLSS is the most operationally proven system, sustaining crews for up to 6 months through oxygen generation (electrolysis), carbon dioxide removal (lithium hydroxide and regenerable sieves), water recycling (90 percent recovery), temperature control (radiators), and pressure regulation (nitrogen buffer, oxygen feedback). These systems are reliable near Earth, where cargo resupply is feasible and Earth's magnetosphere provides radiation shielding. However, deep-space missions to Mars will require significantly more advanced ECLSS: water recovery above 95 percent, closed-loop oxygen and CO₂ systems, active radiation shielding, and possibly bioregenerative systems. Current technology is not sufficient. NASA and ESA are developing advanced systems for Mars missions, with expected deployment in the 2030s. The margin between survival and failure in space is impossibly thin — measured in millimeters of aluminum, kilograms of oxygen, and percentage points of recycling efficiency. Every astronaut who orbits Earth survives only because thousands of engineers have designed, tested, and maintained systems that work reliably in the harshest environment humans have ever entered.
Read next:
Follow new articles
Add SciHub101 to your feed reader to see new science and technology stories.
About the Author
SciHub101 is an independent science and technology publication founded and edited by Buğra Sözeri, a software engineer and app developer based in Türkiye. AI tools assist with drafting and research. Source documentation in the existing archive is uneven, and articles are being reviewed and corrected. The Editorial Team byline identifies editorial responsibility; it does not certify specialist or independent human review. Where we compare products, anything built by our own team is labelled as such — see the editorial guidelines and About page for how corrections and disclosures work.
Related Articles

The Search for Extraterrestrial Life: Where Do We Stand?
The search for life beyond Earth focuses on two main questions: (1) Has intelligent life evolved elsewhere in the cosmos? (2) Has life in any form (microbial) emerged on exoplanets or moons? The Drake Equation (1961) estimated the number of communicative civilizations in the Milky Way at N = R × f_p × n_e × f_l × f_i × f_c × L, yielding estimates from 1 to 1 million civilizations depending on parameter assumptions. Yet 70 years of SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) has found no confirmed signals. Meanwhile, exoplanet discoveries (5,500+ as of 2026) reveal that habitable-zone Earth-like planets are common. Mars, Europa, and Enceladus show signs of liquid water and reduced carbon compounds. JWST observations have detected biosignature candidates in exoplanet atmospheres. The paradox is stark: habitable worlds appear common, yet no confirmed biosignatures have been found. This article reviews the evidence for habitable zones, biosignature detection, and the Fermi Paradox.

What Are Fast Radio Bursts? The Universe's Brightest Millisecond Flashes
Fast radio bursts emit as much energy in a few milliseconds as the Sun does in days, yet last only briefly and come from across the universe. Their origin remained hidden for 17 years until a breakthrough discovery revealed that repeating FRBs originate from magnetars.

How Astronauts Live in Space: The Complete Guide to Daily Life in Orbit
Sleeping in a sleeping bag on a wall, recycling urine into drinking water, and exercising to save your bones. This is life in space.

The International Space Station: How It Works and Why It Matters
A football field-sized laboratory orbiting at 17,500 mph, crewed continuously since 2000. Here's how the ISS actually works.

How Space Suits Work — The $12 Million Garment Keeping Astronauts Alive
A NASA spacesuit costs more than a Manhattan penthouse. Here is exactly what you are paying for — layer by layer, threat by threat.

Cardiovascular Changes in Astronauts: ISS Long-Term Health Studies
ISS research reveals how weightlessness causes fluid shifts, cardiac deconditioning, and blood flow changes—insights applicable to heart disease treatment on Earth.